Skip to main content

Methodology

Go Inside a PV Module

Frame & Adhesives

View Details

Glass & Glass Coating

View Details

Solar Cell Layer

View Details

Backsheet or Rear Glass

View Details

Front Encapsulant

View Details

Rear Encapsulant

View Details

Junction Box & Adhesives

View Details

Frame
Frame heights tested for this Scorecard: 6

Frame Adhesive
Frame adhesive types tested for this Scorecard: 15

Front Glass
Suppliers tested for this Scorecard: 12

Glass Coating
Models tested for this Scorecard: 24

Front Encapsulant
Models tested for this Scorecard: 27

Cells
Manufacturers tested for this Scorecard: 23

Interconnects
Types tested for this Scorecard: >15Flux

BOM data
14 different flux models were tested for this Scorecard.

Back Encapsulant
Models tested for this Scorecard: 33

Backsheet or Glass
Types tested for this Scorecard: 34
71% of BOMs used a backsheet; 29% used rear glass

Junction Box
Suppliers tested for this Scorecard: 18

Junction Box Pottant
Pottant types tested for this Scorecard: 14

Diodes
Suppliers tested for this Scorecard: 23

Junction Box Adhesive
Adhesive types tested for this Scorecard: 15

Connectors
Suppliers tested for this Scorecard: 17

The Importance of PQP Testing

Changes in PV module components can have big impacts to reliability and performance, and the industry’s certification tests are typically not rigorous enough to identify these potential issues. Module warranties also often have shortcomings that leave site owners exposed to significant financial losses. Kiwa PVEL’s PV Module PQP is a comprehensive protocol of tests focused on addressing these concerns and helping module buyers achieve better procurement.

Four principles have guided the PQP since it was launched in 2012: the importance of empirical data replacing assumptions; using standard processes for benchmarking across products; third-party witnessing of the PQP sample production to remove hand-picked, golden samples; and updating the PQP test plan regularly to keep it relevant to current module technology and manufacturing processes.

Visit kiwa.com/pvel/pqp/methodology to read more on these topics and see the PQP test chart.

How BOMs are Scored

To be eligible for the 2024 Scorecard, manufacturers must have:

  • Completed the PQP sample production factory witness after October 1, 2022
  • Submitted at least two factory-witnessed PV module samples to all PQP reliability tests, as per Kiwa PVEL’s BOM test requirements.

The 2024 PV Module Reliability Scorecard shows Top Performers for seven PQP test categories.

Top Performers are determined by averaging that specific test’s results for every BOM tested by Kiwa PVEL that is sold under the same model type. To be listed as a Top Performer, the modules must not have experienced a wet leakage failure, a ‘major’ defect during visual inspection or a diode failure during that particular test.

  • Top Performers for TC, DH, MSS and PID must have < 2% power degradation.
  • Top Performers for HSS must not have experienced glass breakage during hail testing using 40 mm hail or larger (the actual hail size is shown in the Top Performer list).
  • Top Performers for LID + LETID must have < 1% power degradation when combining the LID and LETID test results.
  • Top Performers for PAN performance must place in the top quartile for energy yield in Kiwa PVEL’s PVsyst simulations.

Not all products or model types are represented in every test. Manufacturers can choose not to be listed in the Scorecard. In some cases, test results for some test categories were not available at the time of Scorecard publication. Kiwa PVEL’s Premium Partner Program subscribers access more detailed PQP results on a quarterly basis rather than waiting for the next Scorecard. Find out more about subscribing here.

Procure better modules. Get access to the Scorecard data every quarter.

Sign up as a Kiwa PVEL Premium Partner

Continue Exploring the 2024 Scorecard